O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.

Caution
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 782·48 Cal. App. 4th 1076·56 Cal. Rptr. 2d 386·96 Daily Journal DAR 10219·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6194
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 1996A066822California10,477 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haerle, J.

I. Introduction

Judith O’Connor, administrator of the estate of Gerald O’Connor, appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of Old Republic Surety Company (Old Republic) which absolves Old Republic of liability for damage caused to the conservatorship estate of Gerald O’Connor by Richard Bronson (Bronson), a San Francisco attorney appointed to act as “successor conservator” for Gerald O’Connor’s estate. The judgment declares to be void both an April 9, 1992, order appointing Bronson successor conservator for Gerald O’Con-nor’s estate, and letters of conservatorship issued to Bronson pursuant to that order. The judgment also rescinds a bond issued by Old Republic guaranteeing the faithful performance of Bronson’s duties as successor conservator of Gerald O’Connor’s estate.

We conclude that the order appointing Bronson successor conservator and letters of conservatorship issued to him are not void and that Old Republic is precluded from challenging their validity. We also find that Old Republic is not entitled to rescission. Accordingly, we reverse.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

A. The Conservatorship

On August 30, 1984, Kathleen Porter and Grace Coyne were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.