Irizarry

People v. Irizarry

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 772·37 Cal. App. 4th 967·44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 88·44 Cal. Rptr. 88·95 Daily Journal DAR 10950
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 1995B085264California2,675 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Richard Lee Irizarry appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial resulting in his conviction for first degree burglary, with court findings he had two prior felony convictions for which he had served separate prison terms. (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 667.5, subd. (b).)

Appellant contends: I. “The trial court erred in refusing appellant’s request for instruction on unauthorized entry of property as a lesser related offense.” n. “Appellant’s presence at the readback of testimony could not be waived by counsel” and “[t]he failure to obtain [a] waiver of [appellant’s] presence was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Facts and Proceedings Below

Prosecution Evidence

Viewing the evidence in accordance with the usual rules on appeal (People v. Ochoa (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1199, 1206 [ 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 23 , 864 P.2d 103 ]), in January of 1994, Charles Mannak lived at 43931 Delgado Court in Lancaster. His residence had an attached garage. During the evening of January 12, 1994, Mannak closed the garage door from the inside with his automatic garage door opener and entered his residence through the door leading from the garage’s interior into the residence. The large garage…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.