Gonzales v. Superior Court

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 823·37 Cal. App. 4th 1302·44 Cal. Rptr. 144·44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 144·95 Daily Journal DAR 11445
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1995F023476California3,660 words

Opinion

Opinion

Acting, J.

Does “Three Strikes—The Legislation,”

Penal Code section 667, subdivisions (b) through (i), apply to California convictions predating its March 7, 1994, effective date? Four recent cases have held the law applies: People v. Anderson (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 587 [ 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 474 ] (Anderson); People v. Reed (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1608 [ 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 47 ] (Reed); People v. Sipe (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 468 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 266 ] (Sipe); and People v. Green (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 280 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 249 ] (Green). We do likewise.

An information charged petitioner Danny Gonzales with assault with intent to commit rape (count I, § 220) and assault with a deadly weapon (count II, § 245, subd. (a)(1)), both crimes occurring March 8, 1994. Appended to count I were special allegations that Gonzales had suffered prior convictions in 1980 and 1981, respectively, for robbery (§ 211) and residential burglary (§ 459), each crime being a serious felony within the meaning of sections 1192.7 and 667, subdivision (d). Appended to each count were four prior prison term enhancement allegations. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).)

Gonzales filed a motion to strike the prior felony conviction allegations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.