Lowe

California Maryland Funding, Inc. v. Lowe

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 863·37 Cal. App. 4th 1798·44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 784·44 Cal. Rptr. 784·95 Daily Journal DAR 12025
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 1995B075681California3,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Introduction

In the underlying action for ejectment, filed by plaintiff First Boston Credit Corporation, now named California Maryland Funding, Inc., defendant Wyonna Dell Lowe cross-complained to quiet title to the same property, claiming acquisition by adverse possession. Defendant has appealed from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, contending it is not supported by substantial evidence. Based on settled California Supreme Court case law, we hold defendant’s earlier lawsuit over the right to the property, which was filed during the statutory period for adverse possession, but later dismissed for failure to prosecute, did not operate to toll the statute of limitations. Therefore defendant’s occupancy of the property was continuous for the statutory period. Defendant otherwise carried her burden of proving she satisfied all the elements of adverse possession. By contrast, plaintiff adduced no admissible evidence defendant’s occupancy was permissive. Accordingly, the judgment for plaintiff is reversed with directions to enter a new and different judgment in favor of defendant, Wyonna Dell Lowe.

Factual and Procedural Synopsis

Viewed in accordance with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.