LeFlore

LeFlore v. Grass Harp Productions, Inc.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 716·57 Cal. App. 4th 824·67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 340·97 Daily Journal DAR 11773·33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 355
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 1997B098924California6,229 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boren, J.

This case involves a so-called “negative pickup” deal surrounding a motion picture production. Appellants assert that the term reflects a common business arrangement in the entertainment industry. The particular question presented here is whether the arrangement characterized as a “negative pickup” deal created in appellants a superior security interest in tangible film materials, specifically movie film negatives.

Appellants New Line Productions, Inc., New Line Cinema Corp., and Motion Picture Guarantors, Ltd. (MPG) entered this debtor judgment matter as third party claimants. They contend that they acquired a superior security interest in the motion picture The Grass Harp by virtue of a “negative pickup” contractual arrangement with Grass Harp Productions, Inc. (GHP), the film’s producer. The superior court denied the third party claimants’ claims to a superior security interest in the film materials and a right to possess them. As a result, Solomon J. LeFlore (respondent) executed a lien against the The Grass Harp film materials to satisfy a judgment against GHP. The third party claimants appeal from the superior court’s orders denying their respective claims.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.