Grenier

Grenier v. City of Irwindale

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 737·57 Cal. App. 4th 931·67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 454·97 Daily Journal DAR 12003·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7458
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 1997B102909California4,748 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grignon, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Arthur Grenier appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent City of Irwindale in this action for dangerous condition of public property with respect to a flooded street. We conclude the city has established the defense of design immunity under Government Code section 830.6. A public entity defendant establishes design immunity for purposes of summary judgment when it presents substantial evidence of the reasonableness of the design, even if conflicting evidence of the design’s reasonableness is presented by the plaintiff. Moreover, design immunity, once acquired, is not lost until the public entity has notice of a change in physical conditions which has created a dangerous condition. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background

On June 5, 1993, Amelia McDonald was driving northbound on Buena Vista Street in the City of Irwindale (the City). It was raining and the street was flooded to some extent. McDonald lost control of her vehicle. McDonald’s car jumped the curb and hit a wheelbarrow, propelling it into Grenier, who had been working on private property on the east side of the street. Grenier suffered physical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.