Epstein

Epstein v. Abrams

Bad Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 757·57 Cal. App. 4th 1159·67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 555·97 Daily Journal DAR 12195·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7594
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1997B108279California3,523 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

Appellant Lawrence M. Lebowsky was the attorney of record for defendants and cross-complainants Steven G. Abrams, Alan Abrams (Steven’s son), and Abrams Veterinary Corporation, in the present action brought by plaintiffs and respondents Alan Epstein, and Devonshire Veterinary Clinic, Inc. Appellant was successful in obtaining summary judgment on behalf of Alan Abrams and in securing an award of attorney fees in Alan Abrams’s favor; Alan Abrams was dismissed from the lawsuit. The action proceeded between the remaining Abrams defendants and the plaintiffs. After appellant filed and served notice of his contractual attorney’s lien, the remaining litigants and Alan Abrams attempted to enter into a global settlement agreement, a necessary component of which was Alan Abrams’s agreement to execute a satisfaction of the judgment in his favor for attorney fees and costs. Respondents brought a motion in the trial court seeking court approval of the settlement, and the trial court issued an order granting the motion. The trial court later denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the order. Appellant appeals from these orders, contending that the trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.