In Re Adam R.

People v. Adam R.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 678·57 Cal. App. 4th 348·67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 76·97 Daily Journal DAR 11131·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6938
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 1997D027535California1,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

McDonald, J.

I

Procedural Background

In September 1996 the People filed an amended petition in the juvenile department of the superior court alleging that 12-year-old Adam R. is a person within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 as a result of the commission of 7 residential burglaries. (Pen. Code, § 459.) The petition sought to have Adam declared a ward of the court

At the November 1996 adjudication hearing the court found true the petition allegations on two counts of residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and dismissed the other five counts. The court found the maximum period of confinement to be seven years and four months. It then entered the following finding: “The Court finds unusual circumstances as follows: The Minor Was Under the Age of 12 Years at the Time the Offense Was Committed. The Co-Participants Were Substantially Older Than the Minor pursuant to WIC 654.3. Hearing on the petition filed September 13,1996 is continued for 6 months and the minor, with the minor and parent or guardian’s consent, is ordered to comply with the following program of supervision . . . :” The court then set forth the conditions of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.