PeopleSoft

Marriage of Nasca v. PeopleSoft

Good Law
87 F. Supp. 2d 967·1999 WL 649647·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13140
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1999C 97-4639 VRWCalifornia4,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walker, J.

ORDER

This action originated in 1994, when plaintiff Peter Nasca filed for the dissolution of his marriage to plaintiff Denise Nasca in Contra Costa Superior Court. California Family Code § 2337(c)(6)(A) requires that a party’s retirement or pension plan be joined as a party to a divorce proceeding. On December 10, 1997, plaintiffs joined Peter Nasca’s employer, PeopleSoft, as a party pursuant to section 2337. PeopleSoft manages Mr. Nasca’s retirement plan, which is regulated by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”).

On December 18, 1997, defendant removed the action to this court. On December 23, 1997, defendant filed two motions. The first sought to sever the pension joinder issue from the divorce action and remand the divorce action to state court. The second motion sought dismissal of PeopleSoft as a party pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) based on ERISA preemption. On January 7, 1998, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the entire case to state court.

The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge James Larson, who heard all three motions on January 28, 1998. Magistrate Judge Larson denied both of defendant’s motions and granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.