Prothero

People v. Prothero

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 659·57 Cal. App. 4th 126·66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 779·97 Daily Journal DAR 10831·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6638
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 1997C023509California3,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Raye, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to failure to register as a sex offender (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (f); further statutory references are to this code) and admitted a “strike” allegation (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12). Over the People’s objection, the trial court declared the offense to be a misdemeanor (§ 17, subd. (b)(3)), suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on probation for three years on the condition he serve one hundred eighty days in Sacramento County jail.

The People appeal (§ 1238, subds. (a)(9), (10); People v. Trausch (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1239, 1243, fn. 5 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 836 ] [unlawful sentence]; People v. Booker (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 1517, 1520-1521 [ 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 715 ] [order dismissing part of action]), contending section 290, subdivision (g) mandated a felony sentence. We agree and shall remand for resentencing.

The underlying facts are undisputed: In February 1990 defendant was convicted of child molestation (§ 288, subd. (a)) and was placed on five years’ probation. On December 6, 1995, a Sacramento sheriff’s detective contacted defendant at his then current residence on Auburn Boulevard. Defendant’s landlady told the detective that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.