Argame

Argame v. Werasophon

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 703·57 Cal. App. 4th 616·67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 281·97 Daily Journal DAR 11497·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7153
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 1997G016554California741 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

Jennelyn Argame was a nurse at a medical center. In her complaint for sex discrimination, constructive discharge, assault and battery, and other causes of action, she alleges Dr. Somchai Werasophon, a staff physician at the center, subjected her to unwanted touching and verbal abuse. The complaint, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 425.10, subdivision (b), did not state the amount of damages being demanded.

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.11, subdivision (b), the center and Dr. Werasophon served Argame with three different requests for a statement of damages, but she never responded. At trial, each defendant made a motion in limine to exclude evidence of damages because of Ar-game’s failure to serve a responsive statement. Argame’s attorney conceded she had not responded, but explained it was her standard practice to ignore those requests because, “I’m not. . . really good at evaluating the value of cases. And it’s always uncomfortable for me to come up with a dollar amount.” The court granted the motions. Since she was now prevented by those rulings from seeking anything but nominal damages, Argame stipulated to entry of judgment in order to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.