Olinger

Olinger v. City of Palm Springs

Good Law
386 F. Supp. 1376
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 1975Civ. 74-2476-AAHCalifornia1,088 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hauk, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This matter having come on for hearing on December 9, 1974 at the hour of 10:00 A.M. before the Honorable A. Andrew Hauk, United States District Court Judge, in his courtroom, United States Courthouse Building, 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California upon the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Action for Failure to State Claim Against Defendant City of Palm Springs, and

The defendant City of Palm Springs having appeared through its counsel Jones & Wilson by Robert E. Jones, and The United States of America, et al. having appeared through its counsel, Mrs. Ernestine Tolin, Assistant U. S. Attorney, and Larry N. Olinger, plaintiff having appeared through his counsel, Michael M. Berger and evidence both oral and documentary having been presented to the court, and good cause appearing therefore; the court now finds and concludes as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT

I

Plaintiff Larry N. Olinger, of American Indian descent, is the owner of certain real property held in trust by the United States Government consisting of approximately twenty acres described as:

Said property is located in the City of Palm Springs, State of California.

II

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.