United States v. Mitchell

Good Law
572 F. Supp. 709·1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13060
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 1983CR-83-0130 MHPCalifornia3,763 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weigel, J.

ORDER

On February 18, 1983, a Grand Jury of this Court returned an indictment against Felix Wayne Mitchell and eight other individuals. Defendants were charged with various offenses, including conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . On June 13, 1983, trial commenced before the Honorable William H. Orrick, Jr. Before and during trial, Mitchell was represented by Arlene West, who was designated as “lead counsel” for defendants. On July 6, 1983, the trial ended when defendants’ motion for mistrial was granted under circumstances below set forth. Now before the Court are two motions, filed on behalf of all defendants, for (1) dismissal of the indictment due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct and (2) dismissal because retrial would violate the fifth amendment guarantee against double jeopardy.

A. Background.

The defense motions are based on events leading up to the mistrial motion involving two Government witnesses and one prospective Government witness: Frederick Sanders, Norbett Bluitt, and Leslie Brigham. The Court now considers the pertinent events as to each.

1. Frederick Sanders

On June 20, 1983, trial testimony began with Sanders’s direct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.