Helus

Helus v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Good Law
309 F. Supp. 2d 1170·2004 WL 569278·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4360
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2004C 02-4779 MHPCalifornia7,642 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Richard Helus brings this action against defendant Equitable Life Assurance Society (“Equitable”) and Does 1 to 20, alleging that Equitable breached its disability income insurance contract with him and acted in bad faith by declaring he was not disabled and threatening to stop benefit payments even though he could not resume the duties of his prior occupation. Plaintiff amended his complaint on June 27, 2003. Now before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment, motion to dismiss and motion to strike. After having considered the parties’ arguments and submissions, and for the reasons set forth below, the court rules as follows.

BACKGROUND

Equitable issued a disability income insurance policy to Helus that was effective July 2, 1990. At the time the policy was issued, Helus was the owner and president of his own construction company, Helus Construction. In July 1992, the company suffered a severe blow when the owner of a $4.5 million project refused to pay Helus Construction for its work as a general contractor. Helus was forced to fire all his employees and could not pay his sub-contractors, which resulted in extended litigation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.