Lenz

Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.

Good Law
572 F. Supp. 2d 1150·2008 WL 3884333·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66335
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2008Case C 07-3783 JFCalifornia2,594 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fogel, J.

Defendants Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing, Inc., and Universal Music Publishing Group (collectively, “Universal”) move to dismiss the instant case for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Court has read the moving papers and has considered the oral arguments of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

On February 7, 2007, Plaintiff Stephanie Lenz (“Lenz”) videotaped her young chil dren dancing in her family’s kitchen. The song “Let’s Go Crazy” by the artist professionally known as Prince (“Prince”) played in the background. The video is twenty-nine seconds in length, and “Let’s Go Crazy” can be heard for approximately twenty seconds, albeit with difficulty given the poor sound quality of the video. The audible portion of the song includes the lyrics, “C’mon baby let’s get nuts” and the song’s distinctive guitar solo. Lenz is heard asking her son, “what do you think of the music?” On February 8, 2007, Lenz titled the video “Let’s Go Crazy # 1” and uploaded it to YouTube.com (“YouTube”), a popular Internet video hosting site, for the alleged purpose of sharing her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.