FEC

Federal Election Commission v. California Democratic Party

Good Law
13 F. Supp. 2d 1031·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17292
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 1998CIV-S-97-891 DFL PANCalifornia3,443 words

Opinion

Opinion

Burrell, J.

JOINT STATUS REPORT

NOW COME PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS, by and through their respective counsel of record, and submit a Joint Status Report in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and the Court’s Orders filed May 9, 1997, and September 2, 1997.

ORDER

Defendants California Democratic Party (“CDP”) and Gary Paul move to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) opposes the motion. For the reasons stated, Defendant CDP’s motion is denied and Defendant Paul’s motion is granted.

/.

STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO A RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION

On a motion to dismiss brought under Rule 12(b)(6), all material allegations in the complaint must be accepted as true and the complaint must be construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); NL Industries, Inc. v. Kaplan, 792 F.2d 896, 898 (9th Cir.1986); North Star International v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 720 F.2d 578, 580 (9th Cir.1983). The court is bound to give the plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.