CFA Northern California, Inc. v. CRT Partners LLP

Good Law
378 F. Supp. 2d 1177·2005 WL 1705765·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18868
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2005C 04-5049 CWCalifornia4,831 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

Defendants move for dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). In the alternative, Defendants move under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) for an order transferring this action to the District of Arizona. Plaintiff opposes the motions. The motions were heard on June 24, 2005. Having considered the parties’ papers, the evidence cited therein and oral argument on the motions, the Court grants Defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims against Defendant Robert Campbell and denies their motion to dismiss the claims against Defendant CRT and Defendant Claire Thomas and denies Defendants’ alternative motion to transfer venue.

BACKGROUND

Except where indicated otherwise, the following information is taken from the Amended Complaint and the Affidavit of Claire Thomas appended to Defendants’ motion. Plaintiff CFA Northern California, Inc. is a California corporation having its principal place of business in California. Defendant CRT Partners, LLP (CRT) is an Arizona limited liability partnership having its principal place of business in Arizona. Defendants Claire Thomas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.