Woodmansee

United States v. Woodmansee

Good Law
388 F. Supp. 36·35 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1197·1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14334
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 1975C-74-1346California6,406 words

Opinion

Opinion

Renfrew, J.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

This is a civil action brought by the United States of America pursuant to Section 7405, Int.Rev.Code of 1954, to recover erroneous refunds of income taxes paid to W. Keith and Teresa Woodmansee (“taxpayers”). Federal jurisdiction over the subject matter arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 , 1345. Taxpayers filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim entitling the Government to relief. Subsequently plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court has treated taxpayers’ motion as one for summary judgment.

Defendant W. Keith Woodman-see (“Woodmansee”) was a flight engineer for Pan American Airlines whose duties resulted in service on Pan American’s foreign air routes. With the exception of a period from late 1960 until early 1964, Woodmansee resided in and was based in the United States. During the 1961-1963 period he resided abroad and claims he flew as a. flight engineer entirely within German air space. During 1961, 1962 and 1963 he paid German income taxes on his wages and apparently was exempted from United States income taxes.

In 1960 and 1964…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.