In Re Mercury Interactive Corp. Deriv. Litigation

Good Law
487 F. Supp. 2d 1132
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 2007C 05-4642 JF (PVT), C 06-2971 JF (PVT)California4,711 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sara B. Brody, Cecilia Y. Chan, Heller Ehrman, Asim M. Bhansali, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Kirk Andrew Dublin, Elise Natalie Milstein, John D. Cline, Adam Richard Sand, Esq., Jones Day, James Neil Kramer, Lucy Edmond Buford, Michael Todd Scott, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Jeffrey S. Facter, Patrick David Robbins, Shearman & Sterling LLP, Douglas R. Young, C. Brandon Wisoff, James C. Mann, Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, Eric S. Goldstein, Mark F. Pomerantz, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, LLP, Roberto Finzi, Andrew T. Solomon, Franklin B. Velie, Sullivan & Worcester, LLP, New York, NY, Thomas James Martin, Jared Lee Kopel, Christina Lucen Costley, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich and Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants.

Stephen Lyle Porter, Whitehead Porter & Gordon LLP, San Francisco, CA, Glenn F. Ostrager, Ostrager Chong Flaherty & Broitman P.C., Paul D. Wexler, Bragar Wexler & Eagel, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff/Mercury Interactive Corp. Derivative Litigation.

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DIMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

FOGEL, District Judge.

1. The Consolidated Action

Plaintiff Robert Korhely, an owner of common stock of Mercury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.