Fratt

Fratt v. Robinson

Good Law
203 F.2d 627
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 195313111California4,478 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

It is alleged in the complaint which was filed in the United States District Court, that the defendants-appellees acquired corporate stock from the plaintiff-appellant through fraudulent representations by the use of the United States mails, the telephone, and other means and instrumental-ities of interstate commerce; thus violating Securities Exchange Commission’s Rule X-10B-5 which implements § 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 881 , 891, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j. Of specific application here is § 10(b), subdivision (b) of § 78j, 15 U.S.C.A. Hereinafter we shall refer to the implemented section of the Act as § 10. The stock was not handled on or through any securities exchange, or any stock-dealing organization, nor by any person connected with any business sometimes referred to as “over-the-counter markets” or businesses. The stock was not listed with or upon or put for sale with any stock or security-exchange or sales business.

The defendants made motions to dismiss the action upon several grounds, and the court granted the motion. to dismiss specifically upon the one ground only, to-wit, that § 10 of the Act does not embrace transactions in stock- which have no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.