United States v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
446 F. Supp. 2d 1140·2006 WL 2273127·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55107
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 2006CIV-SQ51693 DFL GGHCalifornia2,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Levi, J.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant City and County of San Francisco, Hetch Hetchy Water and Power (“San Francisco”) moves to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) of plaintiff the United States (“United States”). For the reasons stated below, the court: (1) GRANTS San Francisco’s motion to dismiss the United States’ fourth claim; (2) GRANTS San Francisco’s motion to dismiss the United States’ fifth and seventh claims; (3) GRANTS San Francisco’s motion to dismiss the United States’ eighth claim; and (4) DENIES San Francisco’s motion to dismiss the United States’ first, second, third, and sixth claims.

I.

The United States alleges the following facts in the complaint:

On August 23, 1999, a fire, which came to be known as the “Pilot Fire,” started on private land and spread to the Stanislaus National Forest (FAC ¶ 6.) The fire started when a tree hit a power line owned and operated by San Francisco. (Id. ¶ 6. The Pilot Fire eventually burned 4,028 acres of National Forest land. (Id. ¶ 9.)) According to the complaint, San Francisco was negligent in not maintaining the area around its power lines. (Id. ¶ 7.) On February 18, 2000, the United States submitted a claim to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.