Mills

United States v. Mills

Good Law
446 F. Supp. 2d 1115·2006 WL 2381329·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62066
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2006CR02-938(E)DOCCalifornia12,161 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carter, J.

ORDER RE: PENALTY PHASE PROCEDURES

Before the Court are two issues concerning the procedures of the death penalty phase of the Aryan Brotherhood trial: (1) whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment applies during the penalty phase of a capital trial; and (2) whether proof of unadjudicated crimes, when offered as evidence to prove the alleged non-statutory aggravating factor of future dangerousness, should be subject to an independent burden of proof. After considering extensive written and oral argument submitted by the parties, for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby makes final its tentative rulings that: (1) Testimonial hearsay offered to prove statutory and non-statutory aggravating factors in the death penalty selection phase is barred by the Confrontation Clause; and (2) unadjudicated criminal acts offered to prove the non-statutory aggravating factor of future dangerousness are not subject to an independent burden of proof.

I. BACKGROUND

On July 29, 2006, a jury rendered guilty verdicts to Counts Six and Seven of the First Superseding Indictment against Defendants Barry Byron Mills and Tyler Davis Bingham. Counts Six and Seven each allege that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.