Wills

Wills v. Terhune

Good Law
404 F. Supp. 2d 1226·2005 WL 1417145·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29538
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20051:CVF986052OWWDLBPCalifornia2,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wanger, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DOCS. 138, 185)

The Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are before the Court concerning Plaintiffs motion for prelimi nary injunction. The Plaintiff timely filed objections on August 12, 2005. The court has conducted a de novo review pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b). The Magistrate Judge has thoroughly analyzed the factual and legal issues surrounding Plaintiffs contentions that the illumination in the security housing unit cell in which he is housed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

Plaintiff fails to demonstrate the requisite likelihood of success on the merits, fails to establish he will suffer irreparable harm, and fails to demonstrate that no legitimate penological reasons exist for security lights in the segregated housing unit to permit correctional officers to observe the activities within the cell at a reasonable distance for the security of the officers and inmates.

For all these reasons:

1. The Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.