Lopes

Lopes v. Vieira

Good Law
688 F. Supp. 2d 1050·2010 WL 431767·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7801
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2010CV-F-06-1243 OWW/SMSCalifornia7,963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wanger, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY AND FOR SANCTIONS (Doc. 104), DENYING DEFENDANT DOWNEY BRAND’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (Doc. 106), AND DENYING DEFENDANT DOWNEY BRAND’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF VALLEY GOLD LLC ON THE ISSUE OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE (Doc. 96)

On August 3, 2009, Plaintiffs moved to compel defendant Downey Brand LLP (“Downey Brand”) to produce (1) all billing records and/or invoices related to Valley Gold, LLC (“Valley Gold”) or Central Valley Dairymen (“CVD”) for the period January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2004; (2) all versions or drafts of any private Offering Memorandum prepared for Valley Gold; (3) all documents that reflect, refer, or relate to Downey Brand’s preparation of a confidential private Offering Memorandum for Valley Gold; (5) all communications that refer or relate to what disclosures should or should not be included in the confidential private Offering Memorandum prepared for Valley Gold; (6) all communications that refer or relate to the distribution of the confidential private Offering Memorandum to Valley Gold or its investors;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.