Operating Engineers' Pension Trust Fund v. Clark's Welding & MacHine

Good Law
688 F. Supp. 2d 902·2010 WL 546679·188 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2209·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11628
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2010Case 09-0044 SCCalifornia5,965 words

Opinion

Opinion

Conti, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mo tion”) filed by Plaintiffs Operating Engineers’ Pension Trust Fund (“Operating Engineers”), Gil Crosthwaite (“Crosthwaite”), and Russ Burns (“Burns”), as Trustees (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Docket No. 50. Defendants Clark’s Welding and Machine (“Clark’s Welding”), Sylvester Haberman (“Haberman”), and Franz Edelmayer (“Edelmayer”) (collectively “Defendants”) filed an Opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a Reply. Docket Nos. 77, 78. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural Background

On January 7, 2009, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint against Defendants seeking payment of withdrawal liability in the sum of $330,921. Docket No. 1 (“Comph”) ¶ 1. On May 8, 2009, 2009 WL 1324049 , the Court denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Docket No. 25. Defendants filed their Answer on May 21, 2009. Docket No. 30 (“Answer”). On July 28, 2009, 2009 WL 2252121 , the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike. Docket No. 43.

After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.