Consolidated Salmonid Cases

Good Law
688 F. Supp. 2d 1013·2010 WL 796772·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20278
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20101:09-CV-1053 OWW DLBCalifornia5,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wanger, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NEPA ISSUES (Docs. 82 & 83).

I. INTRODUCTION

These consolidated cases all challenge the June 4, 2009 issuance of a biological opinion by the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), finding that the coordinated operations of the federal Central Valley Project (“CVP”) and State Water Project (“SWP”) are likely to jeopardize the continued existence and adversely affect the critical habitat of certain salmonid and other species (“2009 Salmonid BiOp”), as well as the implementation of the terms of that BiOp by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Reclamation”). Because the 2009 Salmonid BiOp found that planned coordinated Project operations would jeopardize the continued existence of and/or adversely modify the critical habitat of several of the species, 2009 Salmonid BiOp at 1-2, NMFS proposed a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (“RPA”) that imposes a number of operating restrictions and other measures on the Projects. The RPA included numerous elements for each of the various project divisions and associated stressors, which NMFS concluded “must be implemented in its entirety to avoid jeopardy and ad verse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.