Lamke

Lamke v. Sunstate Equipment Co., LLC

Good Law
319 F. Supp. 2d 1029·2004 WL 1173120·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9881
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 2004C-03-4956 EMCCalifornia2,440 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (Docket Nos. 12,18)

Having considered the parties’ briefing and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff Joseph Lamke’s motion to remand. The Court also denies Mr. Lamke’s request for attorney’s, fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c).

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On September 29, 2003, Mr. Lamke filed suit against Defendant Sunstate Equipment Co., LLC (“Sunstate”). More specifically, Mr. Lamke asserted claims for (1) negligence, (2) breach of implied contract, (3) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (4) fraud and deceit, and (5) wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Subsequently, Sunstate removed the case to federal court and Mr. Lamke then filed a motion to remand to state court. This is the motion currently pending before this Court.

In his complaint, Mr. Lamke alleges the following facts: He was employed by Sunstate as a sales manager for almost five years and had a history of positive reviews and promotions with the company. See Compl. ¶¶ 1, 7. In spite of this, on or about August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.