Gross

Gross v. Unumprovident Life Insurance

Good Law
319 F. Supp. 2d 1129·2004 WL 1179274·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9902
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 18, 2004CV 03-4335-SVW (PJWx)California15,886 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING TOTAL DISABILITY ISSUE IN PLAINTIFF’S BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM AND TOTAL AND RESIDUAL DISABILITY ISSUES IN DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIM.

I. INTRODUCTION/FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Dr. Gross is an orthopedic surgeon. He became permanently disabled when, as a result of diabetes, he developed numbness in his hands and feet as well as problems with his eyes, all of which led to his ceasing to perform surgery on December 17, 2001. On February 7, 2002, Dr. Gross filed a request for total disability benefits under two policies with Paul Revére, a disability income policy and a business overhead expense policy. After being asked to provide a great deal of evidence, he was denied benefits under his policies on January 16, 2003 because Defendants determined that he did not fit within the definitions of “totally disabled” in his two policies. The primary question in this action is whether Dr. Gross is entitled to coverage for total disability under the policies issued by Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (“Paul Revere”). A secondary question is whether Dr. Gross is entitled to residual disability benefits,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.