National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative v. DIRECTV, Inc.

Good Law
319 F. Supp. 2d 1094·2003 WL 23521293·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25371
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2003CV 99-5666 LGB(CWX), CV 00-00368 LGB, CV 00-2117 LGB, CV 00-8672 LGB, CV 01-6220 LGBCalifornia6,739 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baird, J.

ORDER DENYING PEGASUS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE

I. INTRODUCTION

Non-parties Pegasus Satellite Television, Inc. and Golden Sky Systems, Inc. (together, “Pegasus”) move to intervene in Case Nos. 99-5666 & 99-8672 (the “NRTC Actions”) for the limited purpose of objecting to the settlement of those actions. Pega sus alleges that the basis for its motion to intervene is that the parties to the NRTC Actions, DIRECTV, Inc. and Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. (jointly “DIRECTV”) and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (“NRTC”), have executed a contingent settlement agreement which allegedly affects Pegasus’ interest without its consent.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that several separate cases involving DIRECTV, NRTC, Pegasus, and the Class have been consolidated before this Court. Pegasus’ motion deals solely with intervention in Case Nos. 99-5666 & 99-8672 (the “NRTC Actions”). The factual and procedural history of these cases are lengthy; the Court only refers to the facts and procedural history that is directly relevant to this Order.

A. The Parties to the Consolidated Actions

NRTC, DIRECTV, Pegasus, and the Class are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.