Lockyer

NATIONAL ASS'N OF OPTOMETRISTS & OPTIC. v. Lockyer

Good Law
463 F. Supp. 2d 1116
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 2006CIV. S-02-1464 LKK/DADCalifornia11,433 words

Opinion

Opinion

KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of California's statutory scheme regulating the manner in which interstate optical companies sell eyewear in California. Plaintiffs are the National Association of Optometrists and Opticians ("NAOO") and two out-of-state optical companies, LensCrafters, Inc. and Eye Care Centers of America, Inc. ("ECCA"). Both LensCrafters and ECCA own numerous optical stores throughout the United States. Defendants are the Attorney General of California and the Director of the California Department of Consumer Affairs, both sued in their official capacities. [1] Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the challenged statutory and regulatory provisions violate the Commerce Clause, Equal Protection Clause, Due Process Clause and First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and seek to enjoin enforcement of the provisions on that basis.

Currently pending before the court are motions for summary judgment fad by plaintiffs and defendants. These motions address the question of whether the challenged statutory scheme violates the dormant Commerce Clause. These motions were originally filed in 2003; however, on March 10, 2004,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.