Lisker

Lisker v. Knowles

Good Law
463 F. Supp. 2d 1008·2006 WL 3462589·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90792
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 2006CV 04 02687 VAP(RZ)California19,430 words

Opinion

Opinion

Phillips, J.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Respondent has objected. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the Report. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s-Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. The motion to dismiss is denied, and the matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the undersigned submits this Report and Recommendation to the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, United States District Judge.

In 1985, Petitioner Bruce E. Lisker was convicted in state court of murdering his mother. In 2004, he filed the present action, seeking a federal writ of habeas corpus. Resppndent has. moved to dismiss, arguing that the one year…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.