Valenzuela

Valenzuela v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp.

Good Law
614 F. Supp. 2d 1089·2009 WL 900735·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26997
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 2009CIV-F-05-1600 AWI SMSCalifornia5,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ishii, J.

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

I. History

Defendant Giumarra Vineyards Corporation is a commercial table grape grower based in Kern County. Plaintiffs Santos Valenzuela, Trinidad Ruiz, Marta Rincon de Diaz, Ramon Cervantes Perales, and Hugo Perez Rios are former employees of Defendant. The operative complaint is the first amended complaint, (“FAC”). Doc. 87. Plaintiffs’ claims are divided into nine causes of action: (1) violations of the federal Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Workers Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq. (“AWPA”); (2) breach of contract; (3) failure to pay overtime wages; (4) failure to reimburse work expenses; (5) failure to provide required meal periods as required by the Industrial Welfare Commission Work Order 14 (“IWC Order 14-2001”) and Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 ; (6) failure to provide required rest periods as required by the Industrial Welfare Commission Work Order 14 (“IWC Order 14-2001”) and Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 ; (7) failure to keep accurate employee wage statements; (8) failure to pay wages in a timely manner at the termination of employment; and (9) violation of the Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code § 17200 et seq. (“UCL”) through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.