White

White v. Trans Union, LLC

Good Law

462 F. Supp. 2d 1079·2006 WL 3354136·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80584

United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2006CV 05 1073 DOC(MLGX)California2,321 words

Opinion

Carter, J.

PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Before the Court is Defendant TransUn-ion, LLC (“TransUnion”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“SACC”) for Failure to State a Claim (“Motion”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.Civ.P. 78; Local R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for October 16, 2006 was removed from the Court’s calendar. After reviewing the moving, opposing, and replying papers, for the reasons set forth below the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Terri N. White, Jose Hernandez, Robert Radcliffe, Chester Carter, Maria Falcon, and Alex Gidi are six individuals who filed for bankruptcy pursuant to Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and were granted orders of discharge by a U.S. Bankruptcy Court. SACC ¶ 11. TransUnion is a national repository for consumer credit information and is engaged in the business of Credit Reporting. Id. ¶ 12. For each of the six named plaintiffs, TransUnion has furnished reports to third parties (“Credit Reports”) in which it has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.