Salmo

Salmo v. United States Department of Agriculture

Good Law
226 F. Supp. 2d 1234·2002 WL 31322545·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19468
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2002CIV. 02CV348(AJB)California1,414 words

Opinion

Opinion

Battaglia, J.

Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc No. 8]

The Government moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. The Plaintiffs have filed a Notice of Non-Opposition, stating that they do not oppose dismissal of this action without prejudice as they anticipate filing a complaint in state court regarding the same subject matter. Plaintiffs have filed no substantive opposition to the Government’s motion. The parties have consented in writing to the hearing and disposition of all matters in this case by Magistrate Judge Battaglia.

The argument presented by Defendant in this case, that 7 U.S.C. § 2021 (g)(2)(C) deprives this Court of federal subject matter jurisdiction, is novel-no other court has addressed this issue. Nonetheless, this Court concludes that the Government is correct, and that this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the decision of the Food and Nutrition Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, disqualifying the Plaintiff store from participating in the Federal Food Stamp Program. Thus, for the reasons set forth herein, the Government’s motion is GRANTED.

Standard of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.