National Labor Relations Board v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co., Inc.

Good Law
206 F.2d 857·32 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2702·1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3587
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 195313622_1California1,600 words

Opinion

Opinion

Denman, J.

This js a petition to enforce an order Gf the National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, pursuant to Section io(e) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e), hereafter the Act.

. , , , . .. . The questions presented by this petition are; (1) whether ^ facts as proven gub_ stantiate the charge; (2) whether rules of evidence were violated by the admission of hearsay evidence; (3) whether there was proof of the allegations of the complaint; and (4) whether the picketing involved was a constitutionally protected activity.

The International Association of Macbinists, hereafter the Machinists, filed ^ with the Board against the Millwri hts Local Union No> 102 United Brotberhood of Renters and Joiners of America, hereafter Millwrights, and G.. om, -r> q t>- r* t W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co., Inc., hereafter the Company. The Millwrights were charged with having caused or attempted to cause the Company to discriminate against one J. L. Myers, a member of the Machinists, in violation of Section 8 (a) (3) of the Act, thereby violating Section 8(b)(1) and (2) of the Act. The-Company was charged with discriminating against Myers in violation of Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.