Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark International, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
Armstrong, J.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Arizona Cartridge Remanufac-turers Association (“ACRA”) and the Motion for Summary Judgment of Lexmark International, Inc (“Lexmark”).
Having read and considered the arguments presented by the parties in the papers submitted to the Court, and the arguments presented by counsel at the September 9, 2003 hearing, the Court hereby DENIES ACRA’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and GRANTS Lexmark’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
This is not a patent case. At least, that is what ACRA would have this Court believe. This is a case about deceptive advertising; about how Lexmark has deceived customers into believing that they are subject to a post-sale condition that, as a matter of law, is unenforceable. Whether or not it is, however, hinges' on whether or not it falls within Lexmark’s patent rights. This may not be a patent case, but to determine whether or not Lexmark has engaged in deceptive and unfair business practices the Court must analyze this case under the…