Van Winkle v. Allstate Insurance

Good Law
290 F. Supp. 2d 1158·2003 WL 22670932·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19855
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 2003EDCV 03-00622-VAP(SGLx)California5,115 words

Opinion

Opinion

Phillips, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND

Defendant Allstate’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike came before the Court for hearing on October 28, 2003. After reviewing and considering all papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, the Motions, as well as the arguments advanced by counsel at the hearing, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to amend.

I. BACKGROUND

A. PLAINTIFFS’ ALLEGATIONS

On or about June 11, 2000, Mr. Johan Reyes (“Reyes”), of New York, rented a 2000 Ford Explorer from Budget Rent-A-Car (“Budget”) located in Los Angeles, California pursuant to a rental agreement. [Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 17.] Reyes purchased insurance for the vehicle from Budget but did not list Mr. Chia Chang (“Chang”), also of New York, as a driver of that vehicle. [Id.]

On or about June 11, 2000, Chang was driving the vehicle owned by Budget and rented to Reyes. [Id. ¶ 18.] Chang caused a motor vehicle collision with a vehicle owned by Plaintiff Anne Van Winkle and driven by Plaintiff Gaurasundari Van Winkle (“Plaintiffs”), citizens and residents of Nevada. [Id. ¶¶ 9, 18.] The accident occurred in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.