Burris

Burris v. Hunter

Good Law
290 F. Supp. 2d 1097·2003 WL 22533458·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24010
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2003EDCV03161RTPLACalifornia1,999 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) DISMISSING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus (“Petition”), Respondent’s Answer, Petitioner’s Opposition to Attorney General’s Answer, all of the records herein and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, neither Petitioner nor Respondent has filed any objections to the Report.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Court accepts and adopts the Report, (2) the Petition be dismissed without prejudice, and (3) Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition without prejudice.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Robert J. Tim-lin, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons discussed below, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition” or “Pet.”) be dismissed without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.