Saldivar-Vargas

United States v. Saldivar-Vargas

Good Law
290 F. Supp. 2d 1210·2003 WL 22700727·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24014
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 200302CR3303California2,189 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rhoades, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSING INDICTMENT

I. Introduction

Defendant Joel Saldivar-Vargas (“Saldivar-Vargas”) is charged in a one-count indictment with being an alien found in the United States after previously being “excluded, deported and removed” in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Saldivar-Vargas moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that his prior removal proceeding may not be used to demonstrate that he was previously removed due to the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) failure to inform him of, and to allow him to apply for, discretionary relief from removal pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 212(c). The court denied that motion. Saldivar-Vargas has filed a motion for reconsideration in light of recent Ninth Circuit case law. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted, and the indictment is dismissed.

II. Background

Saldivar-Vargas, a citizen of Mexico, was granted legal permanent resident status on December 1, 1990. On April 7, 1994, Saldivar-Vargas pleaded guilty to rape by a foreign object. He served 365 days, or one year, in county jail. Under the immigration laws then in effect, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.