Takacs
Takacs v. AG Edwards and Sons, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
Houston, J.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. NO. 82]
INTRODUCTION
On April 27, 2006, Defendant A.G. Edwards and Sons, Inc. (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment came on regularly for hearing. James Clapp, Kevin Mclner-ney and Mark Thierman appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs Drew Takacs, Ryan Flynn and Caitlan Manoogian (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Rebecca Eisen and Daryl Landy appeared on behalf of Defendant. This Court, after hearing the oral argument of counsel, took the matter under submission. Now, after a careful consideration of the pleadings, relevant exhibits, the oral argument of counsel at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth below, this Court DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Drew Takacs and Ryan Flynn (“Plaintiffs”) are former financial consultants with Defendant. See Cplt. at 2. Plaintiffs filed their motion seeking restitution and recovery of alleged overtime pay and business expenses due to them. See Cplt. at 2-3. Plaintiffs seek to bring this action as a class action suit with the following defined classes of plaintiffs: