Shah

City of Carlsbad v. Shah

Good Law
666 F. Supp. 2d 1159·2009 WL 3398785·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96890
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2009Case 08CV1211 JLS (WMc)California4,502 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sammartino, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (2) DECLARING PLAINTIFF AS THE RIGHTFUL OWNER OF THE TRADEMARKS AND LOGO AT ISSUE (3) AUTHORIZING USPTO TO DENY REGISTRATION OF DEFENDANT’S APPLICATIONS AND REGISTER PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS.

In the present action, the City of Carlsbad (“Plaintiff’) alleges various claims against Prince Reza Shah (“Defendant”), including copyright infringement, cybersquatting, unfair competition in violation of the Lanham Act; unfair competition in violation of California’s Business and Professional Code § 17200, and common law unfair competition. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment regarding who holds trademark rights in various marks at issue in the case. In return, Defendant filed a counterclaim in which he seeks a declaration that his trademark rights are superior to that of Plaintiffs, and an injunction against Plaintiff from further utilizing the marks.

The only issue presently before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, which contends that the claim for relief for declaratory judgment regarding trademark rights contains no genuine issue of material fact and is ripe for summary judgment. For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.