United States v. Joey Clark
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 201009-10089California263 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 21 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10089
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-CR-00077-PMP
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JOEY DESHAUN CLARK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 5, 2010 **
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Joey Deshaun Clark appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month
sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). §§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Clark’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have…