United States v. Joey Clark

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 201009-10089California263 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10089

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-CR-00077-PMP

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JOEY DESHAUN CLARK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010 **

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Joey Deshaun Clark appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month

sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). §§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Clark’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.