Colyer

Colyer v. Smith

Good Law
50 F. Supp. 2d 966·1999 WL 345219
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 25, 1999ED CV 98-101 RT(VAPx)California4,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL

The Court, the Honorable Robert J, Timlin, has read and considered plaintiff Greg Colyer’s motion to disqualify defendants’ counsel, defendants’ opposition thereto, and plaintiff Colyer’s reply. The Court concludes as follows:

I.

BACKGROUND

This case represents yet another legal reverberation of the April 1, 1996 high-speed pursuit and forcible arrest of suspected undocumented aliens by former Riverside County deputy sheriff Tracy Watson (Watson). See also Watson v. County of Riverside, 976 F.Supp. 951 (C.D.Cal.1997), ED CV 96-0148 RT (VAPx); Sotero-Vasquez v. County of Riverside, Case No. ED CV 96-227 RT (VAPx); Flores v. County of Riverside, Case No. ED CV 96-227 RT (VAPx). In this action, Riverside County deputy sheriff Greg Colyer (Colyer) and co-plaintiff Riverside Sheriffs Association (RSA) sue the County of Riverside (County), the County Sheriff, and top officials in the County’s Sheriffs Department for depriving Colyer of certain federal constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , the California Constitution and various state statutes.

Plaintiffs allege that Colyer was transferred from his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.