Feezor

Feezor v. Del Taco, Inc.

Good Law

431 F. Supp. 2d 1088·2005 WL 3619386

United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 200504 CV 0097 J RBBCalifornia1,627 words

Opinion

Jones, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Lary Feezor’s (“Plaintiff’) January 14, 2005 Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendants Del Taco Inc., Glasshouse Associates, LLC, and Does 1 through 20 (“Defendants”). [Doc. No. 22.] On February 22, 2005, Defendants opposed the Motion. [Doc. No. 27.] Plaintiff filed a Reply on February 24, 2005. [Doc. No. 30.] All parties are represented by counsel. The Court has determined the issues presented herein are appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1.d.l. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion.

Background

On January 22, 2004, Plaintiff properly served Defendants with Summons and Amended Complaint, alleging he encountered architectural banders that denied him full and equal enjoyment of a restaurant owned and operated by Defendants. (Compl-¶ 18.) The Complaint alleged six causes of action: (1) discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”); (2) discrimination in violation of the Disabled Persons Act; (3) discrimination in violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (“UCRA”); (4) denial of full…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.