Russell

Russell v. The Texas Co.

Good Law
211 F.2d 740·1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4228
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 195414246California1,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pope, J.

The appellant filed a complaint in the District Court alleging three causes of action. The first cause states that the defendant Northern Pacific Railway Company received patent to a certain section of land pursuant to the terms of the Northern Pacific Land Grant of 1864, 13 Stat. 365 ; that it subsequently conveyed the land to plaintiff's pi'ede-cessor excepting and reserving the minerals upon or in the land. It alleges that the purported exception and reservation of such minerals is void, but that notwithstanding such invalidity the Railway Company executed an oil and gas lease to the Texas Company and that the latter Company and its agent, the Frederick T. Manning Drilling Co., have entered upon the land pursuant to the lease and were removing large quantities of oil and gas therefrom, and causing other damage to plaintiff’s land. It alleged that the purported exception and reservation of the minerals and the lease to the Texas Company constitute a cloud upon plaintiff’s title. The second and third causes of action allege that the defendants, the Texas Company and the Drilling Company, were making an unlawful use of plaintiff's land in connection with drilling operations on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.