Migliori

Migliori v. Boeing North American, Inc.

Good Law
97 F. Supp. 2d 1001·2000 WL 553206·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6129
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 17, 2000CV99-13192ABC(RCX)California5,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6)

After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties and the case file, the Court GRANTS IN PART Defendants’ motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

I. Procedural Background

Plaintiffs Mario and Irma Migliori filed a complaint in state court on September 13, 1999 against various entity Defendants related to Boeing North American, Inc. and three individual Defendants. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in November 1999. The entity Defendants (collectively “Boeing”) removed to this Court on December 16,1999.

Boeing moved to dismiss on January 3, 2000. Along with the motion to dismiss, it filed a voluminous request for judicial notice. The case was transferred to this Court on January 21. On January 24, Plaintiffs filed an opposition along with their own smaller request for judicial notice. Plaintiffs also objected to Boeing’s request for judicial notice. Boeing filed a reply on February 1, along with a second much smaller request for judicial notice. On February 18, Defendant M.E. Remey joined in Boeing’s motion. On March 16, Boeing filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.