Oller

Oller v. Bank of America

Good Law
342 F. Supp. 21·10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 877·1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14879
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 1972C-70-2559 SWCalifornia1,111 words

Opinion

Opinion

Williams, J.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Defendant Bank of America initiated a repossession of plaintiff’s automobile under the terms of a conditional sales contract covering the purchase and sale of the subject vehicle. The contract was in the form required by the State of California’s Automobile Sales Finance Act (California Civil Code § 2981 et seq.) and as required, specifically stated that: “[I]f you default in the performance of your obligation under this agreement, the vehicle may be repossessed and you may be subject to suit and liability for the unpaid indebtedness evidenced by this agreement.”

The instrument in question is a conditional sales contract within the meaning of the Automobile Sales Finance Act (Civil Code § 2981(a)), and also comes within the definition of a “secured transaction” as used in the Uniform Commercial Code (California Commercial Code § 9102(2)). The California Commercial Code specifically provides, insofar as secured transactions are concerned, that: “Unless otherwise agreed, a secured party has on default…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.