Brincat

HMH Publishing Co. v. Brincat

Good Law
342 F. Supp. 1275·173 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 182·1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15406
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1972C-70-272California2,901 words

Opinion

Opinion

Williams, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT

This case having come on for trial and the Court having heard testimony, the oral arguments of counsel and having considered the memoranda submitted by the parties, hereby Finds and Concludes as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT

A. Parties and Jurisdiction

1. Plaintiff, HMH Publishing Co. Inc. (hereinafter called “HMH” or “plaintiff” is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal offices and place of business in the City of Chicago, Illinois. HMH is the successor by merger to the assets, business and goodwill of its corporate predecessor, HMH Publishing Co. Inc., an Illinois corporation. After this litigation commenced HMH changed its corporate name to Playboy Enterprises, Inc. References herein to HMH or plaintiff are references to said plaintiff, its corporate predecessor or to Playboy Enterprises, Inc., depending upon the context. Plaintiff Playboy Clubs International, Inc. (“PCI”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal office and place of business in Chicago, Illinois. PCI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Playboy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.