United States v. Jimmy Roberts

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 201009-50090California242 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50090

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-cr-02433-LAB

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JIMMY LOWELL ROBERTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010 **

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jimmy Lowell Roberts appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

100-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Roberts’ counsel has filed a brief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel

of record. We have provided the appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.