United States v. Plaza Mobile Estates

Good Law
273 F. Supp. 2d 1084·2003 WL 21750859
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2003CV91-6255-RMT(GHKx), CV92-3015-RMT(GHKx)California4,148 words

Opinion

Opinion

Takasugi, J.

MEMORANDUM RE MOTION BY PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF-IN-TERVENORS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: PARK RULES

This matter has come before the court on the motion by plaintiff-intervenors and plaintiff United States of America for partial summary judgment against defendants Joseph Sherman, Mike and Darla Morton, and George Briggs re: park rules. Having considered the pleadings and other papers filed herein, the court issues this memorandum in lieu of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” By this motion, plaintiff United States of America and plaintiff-intervenors seek (1) declaration that rules and regulations at Walnut Hills Mobile Home Community (“Walnut Hills”), Rancho La Seda Mobile Home Community (“Rancho La Seda”), Sierra Pines Mobile Home Country Club (“Sierra Pines”), Rancho La Puente Mobile Home Community (“Rancho…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.